The New Frontier in Choice of Law—Trans-State Laws: The Need Demonstrated in Theory and in the Context of Motor Vehicle Guest-Host Controversies

Article by Luther L. McDougal III

Ever since the premises underlying the vested rights theory began to be seriously questioned about four decades ago, the quest of most choice-of-law scholars has been for a theory that would rationally select the intrastate law of a state with some relationship to the controversy to resolve choice-of-law problems. In recent years, a small but steadily increasing number of commentators are suggesting that such a quest is too limited because rational choice-of-law decisions frequently cannot be obtained by applying the intrastate law of a particular state, regardless of how it is selected, to resolve trans-state controversies. These commentators contend that potential choice should be expanded to include trans-state laws or solutions specifically designed to resolve trans-state controversies.


About the Author

Luther L. McDougal III. Professor of Law, Tulane University; B.A. 1959, LL.B. 1962, University of Mississippi; LL.M. 1966, Yale University.

Citation

53 Tul. L. Rev. 731 (1979)