Article by Lee Kovarsky
Over the last decade, federal courts have internalized the idea that interpretations of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) should disfavor habeas relief. This Article explores the strange legislative history surrounding AEDPA's passage and the resulting problems in using “comity,” finality, and federalism” to express this interpretive mood. It demonstrates that such a simplistic reading of habeas reform is deeply misguided. Through the use of public choice and related models, the Article explores the roots of this interpretive problem. It ultimately rejects any attempt to characterize AEDPA by reference to legislative purpose.
About the Author
Lee Kovarsky. Associate, Supreme Court and Appellate Practice Group, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, LLP. B.A. 1999, Yale University; J.D. 2004, University of Virginia.
Citation
82 Tul. L. Rev. 443 (2007)