Article by Robert F. Salvin
Splitting the Regulatory Baby: The Fifth Circuit's Laboresque Solution to Mirant's Bankruptcy—FERC Dilemma
Necessary Fictions: Bankruptcy Jurisdiction After Hood and Katz
Interaction Between Admiralty and Bankruptcy Law: Effects of Globalization and Recurrent Tensions
Navigating the Murky Waters of Admiralty and Bankruptcy Law
The Debtor Class
Navigating the Murky Waters of Admiralty and Bankruptcy Law
When U.S. bankruptcy law converges with federal admiralty law, complex jurisdictional conflicts and constitutional issues arise. This Article explores the history of how courts have treated the intersection of these two complex bodies of federal law, with a particular focus on Article III of the United States Constitution in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision Stern v. Marshall. Because this fundamental issue regarding the power of bankruptcy courts to adjudicate admiralty matters may have a significant practical effect on maritime creditors, it is important that maritime practitioners be cognizant of the principles of bankruptcy jurisdiction. The Article further discusses certain aspects of complex commercial bankruptcy that are relevant to maritime practitioners, providing explanation of the impact of various bankruptcy issues in the maritime context.